Broadband is rapidly expanding into rural America, but according to a governing.com article, the Americans who live in these out-of-the-way areas aren’t exactly knocking down the doors of telecom providers to demand the service.
In fact, it’s just the opposite.
The article cites four major reasons rural residents are choosing to tune out on the internet age:
- Some don’t have a computer (yes, that would prove to be a major impediment to getting on the internet)
- Some lack digital literacy (tough to master the internet even if you have a computer, but don’t know how to use it)
- Some say it’s just too expensive (we just looked at our monthly cable bill and we are forced to agree with those who cite this excuse)
- Some have “learned to live without the internet and just don’t think it’s relative to their lives” (apparently they are unaware of the funny cat videos, Netflix movies and porn that make up such a huge percentage of online traffic)
One group of experts says another group of experts have set themselves up for a major disappointment.
“A lot of people had great expectations for the investments and infrastructure,” says broadband research specialist John Horrigan. “They’re going to have a rude awakening in a couple years if they don’t see people using the services as much as they hoped for.”
It may just be that those who don’t already have internet are never going to get it. They just don’t think they need it.
“A Governing analysis of microdata from the Census Bureau’s 2012 Current Population Survey shows that nearly 53 percent of U.S. householders without Internet service of any kind cited a lack of interest or need as the main reason for nonadoption,” governing.com said. “Another segment of the population remains stuck at slower speeds, mostly in remote areas where it’s costly to deploy service. About 8.5 percent of Americans lack access to connections that the FCC considers to be broadband.”
Converting the non-believers isn’t going to be easy. The further you live from a major metropolitan area, the less likely you are to have internet access. The less education you have, the less likely you are to have internet access. And the older you are, the less likely you are to have internet service. Let’s review the demographics of those who don’t have and seemingly don’t want internet service:
% with internet | Demographic |
---|---|
49% | Rural householders with no college education |
46% | Rural householders age 65 and older |
41% | Rural households with incomes below $25,000 |
As you might expect, the pace of U.S. broadband adoption has slowed down and internet service providers have unexpectedly run into a bit of a brick wall. A recent study shows that approximately 70% of Americans now have home broadband connections. But growth in the hinterlands is harder to come by.
Some parts of rural America offer only painfully slow, unreliable low-grade DSL and dial-up service. For many rural residents, the only local option is found at their local library.
Small, independent telecoms to the rescue?
The article in governing.com reports that small, independent telecoms that are largely driving broadband adoption in many rural areas.
“Large companies often balk at the high costs of broadband deployment in sparsely populated rural areas. Talking to residents directly is generally more effective than offering impersonal promotions, says Rod Bowar, president of the Kennebec Telephone Company in central South Dakota. The company, like some other rural telecoms, holds classes with a focus on how the Internet can help customers in their everyday lives. Ranchers in South Dakota, for example, use streaming video to monitor cattle in their barns.”
But where do those small, independent telecoms find the money to build out their dreams? Uncle Sugar, that’s where.
A federal government organization called the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is spending money like a drunken sailor on shore leave. It handed out $4.4 billion in stimulus funds for broadband connection over the last few years. Most of those grants were specifically earmarked for infrastructure investment, but $249 million was directed toward for digital literacy and other adoption projects.
The NTIA was quick to pat itself on the back and claim that its programs helped enroll nearly 750,000 new broadband subscribers.
Lifeline Broadband to the rescue?
Lifeline Assistance, the free government cell phone program, has proven to be a godsend for low-income Americans.
Experts believe the Federal Communications Commission will soon bring Lifeline into the internet age by funding a new Lifeline Broadband program.
The Commission funded 14 Lifeline Broadband pilot projects across the country. They tested various pricing plans and service levels with eligible low-income consumers in an attempt to determine which offers will encourage the highest adoption rates when a national program is rolled out.
Lifeline Assistance, the free government cell phone program, has demonstrated the huge improvements that technology can make in low-income Americans’ lives. Proponents of Lifeline Broadband believe the same benefits will result from the adoption of a Lifeline Broadband program.
If we can demonstrate the benefits that will accrue to those who have not yet adopted the internet, it could have a huge impact in rural communities.
governing.com tells such a story in Green Bank, West Virginia:
“In Green Bank, the benefits of high-speed Internet are just starting to be realized. Staff at the nearby National Radio Astronomy Observatory previously had to transport hard drives with raw data to West Virginia University in Morgantown a couple of times each week. Now, thanks to a state grant, they’re able to stream data with a 10-gigabit connection in real time. ‘We have been working to get increased Internet speeds in the county for 14 years,’ says Mike Holstine, the observatory’s business manager. ‘The fact that we have added providers is a huge boon to the connectivity of the community.'”
This is just one of a thousands of success stories that will be written after Lifeline Broadband is approved and high-speed internet access extends into rural America. We fully support the Lifeline Broadband program and can’t wait for the day that it is officially announced.
That will be a great day not just for rural America, but America as a whole.
Source: governing.com
Diana says
Hi I’m trying find out if my area has this free or reduced internet services in Knott county Hindman Ky 41822 we have Thacker Grisbsy telephone Internet cable company that basically only services here. I jus learned of any free reduced Internet option were available at all.
Can’t afford it have a son only child n his 7th grade class who does not have Internet r any of it!
I owe big bill too from past I just gotten my disability social security benefits and had it hooked up then my checks were stopped no warning claimed I was over paid so my contract with them came due payable immediately in full for installation fees!
It’s sad feel so badly my son has learning disability speech delayed and really behind in his reading level he needs all help he we can get! Thank you any information greatly appreciated.
Can we use wifi only without internet installed in r home
CheapInternet.com Administrator says
It’s extremely unfortunate, but people living in rural areas are usually underserved by cable TV and cell phone companies. We can’t track the availability of the various programs down to the zip code level, Diana, but we’ve made it as simple as possible by listing all the programs and where they are “generally” available at the following link. If you find one that shows availability somewhere near you, you can always visit that company’s website to get more information on availability. Most of them offer a function that allows you to plug in your address or zip code to help you determine availability. Here’s where you can find that list of low-income internet plans:
https://www.cheapinternet.com/low-income-internet
Davjohn says
1) There are no internet providers in rural areas aside from cable TV companies. 2), Companies like Century Link operate via DSL, and DSL will not carry its signals into rural areas. 3) Just like all other Obama’s socialist programs, no one ever asked who would pay for these programs. Rural residents aren’t that stupid. They know who will pay for it, and they don’t want that.
Cathy says
Not true
You can’t get good connections in the rural areas. Even if you do have it.